A former college soccer player who was benched after she rejected a coach’s demand that players kneel before a game has reached a settlement in her lawsuit against the coach.

Kiersten Hening played for the Virginia Tech women’s soccer team from 2018 to 2020, but ran afoul of coach Charles Adair in 2020 after she would not kneel before a game while a social justice statement was read, according to the New York Post.

Hening filed suit against Adair in 2021, alleging that “because she refused to kneel, he benched her, subjected her to repeated verbal abuse, and forced her off the team,” according to WSLS-TV.

In December, a federal judge gave her the green light to proceed with her suit. However, before that could happen, a $100,000 settlement was reached, according to the Roanoke Times.

A McClatchy News report in the Miami Herald noted that sparring over the settlement took place even after it was reached. The report said the settlement “asserted Hening’s First Amendment rights were violated.”

That is not how Adair framed it.

“I am pleased the case against me has been closed and I am free to move forward clear of any wrongdoing,” Adair wrote in a post-settlement tweet.

Kiersten Hening: I was forced off college soccer team after refusing to kneel https://t.co/J8dQCMf0Tr pic.twitter.com/Hw4M0Onx9l

— New York Post (@nypost) April 23, 2021

Adam Mortara, an attorney representing Hening, fired back, tweeting, “Kiersten Hening was benched for her free speech and you paying a giant settlement proves it.”

pic.twitter.com/OrDkD0Khpl

— CoachChugger (@CoachChugger) January 4, 2023

Kiersten Hening was benched for her free speech and you paying a giant settlement proves it.

— Adam Mortara (@AdamMortara) January 4, 2023

Attorney Cameron Norris, representing Hening, said the settlement did not include an admission of wrongdoing by either party.

Hening said in her lawsuit that although she “supports social justice and believes that black lives matter,” she “does not support BLM the organization,” citing its “tactics and core tenets of its mission statement, including defunding the police,” according to Fox News.

U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Cullen, who said the suit should go forward, held that “Ultimately, Adair may convince a jury that this coaching decision was based solely on Hening’s poor play during the UVA game, but the court, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Hening, cannot reach that conclusion as a matter of law,” the Post reported.

The ruling allowing Hening’s case to go forward said she alleges that Adair “berated her at halftime in front of her teammates, and again at a film-review session the following week, for ‘bi***ing and moaning’ and ‘doing [her] own thing.’”

Do you think more colleges should be held responsible for discriminating against conservatives?






Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Yes: 100% (787 Votes)
No: 0% (0 Votes)